Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Gold Charm Limited v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd., No. 17-1738 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 4, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1738
Decided
April 4, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GOLD CHARM LIMITED,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD., FUNAI ELECTRIC

CO., LTD., TOSHIBA CORP.,

Appellees

2017-1738

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-01417.

JUDGMENT

FREDERICK A. TECCE, Ice Miller LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by AARON ROBERT ETTELMAN; MICHAEL JAMES HOPKINS, Chicago, IL; STEPHEN EMERSON MURRAY, Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP, Philadelphia, PA. ROBERT T. HASLAM, Covington & Burling LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for all appellees. Appellee

2Samsung Display Co., Ltd also represented by JAY I. ALEXANDER, JEFFREY HOWARD LERNER, Washington, DC. MARC ROBERT LABGOLD, Marc R. Labgold, P.C., Reston, VA, for appellee Funai Electric Co., Ltd. Also represented by PATRICK J. HOEFFNER. PAUL MEIKLEJOHN, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Seattle, WA, for appellee Toshiba Corp. Also represented by CLINTON CONNER, Minneapolis, MN; ADAM VINCENT FLOYD, Denver, CO.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 4, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Gold Charm Limited v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd., No. 17-1738 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 4, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1738-20180404
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1738-20180404

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error