Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Komatsu Ltd. v. the American Torch TIP Co., No. 17-1696 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1696
Decided
February 8, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KOMATSU LTD.,

Appellant

v.

THE AMERICAN TORCH TIP CO.,

Appellee

2017-1696

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,300.

JUDGMENT

DAVID TARNOFF, Global IP Counselors LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL THOMAS MURPHY, SUZANNE KONRAD.

MARK FERANDO RUBIO, American Torch Tip, Co., Bradenton, FL, argued for appellee. Also represented by SERGEY VERNYUK, Emerson Thomson Bennett, Akron, OH.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 8, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Komatsu Ltd. v. the American Torch TIP Co., No. 17-1696 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1696-20180208
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1696-20180208

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error