Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Alexsam, Inc. v. Wildcard Systems, Inc., No. 17-1682 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1682
Decided
January 9, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ALEXSAM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

WILDCARD SYSTEMS, INC., EFUNDS

CORPORATION, FIDELITY NATIONAL

INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2017-1682

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 0:15-cv-61736-BB, Judge Beth Bloom.

JUDGMENT

W. LEE GRESHAM, III, Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, Birmingham, AL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JACQUELINE KNAPP BURT, Atlanta, GA; STEVEN WHITEFIELD RITCHESON, Insight, Chatsworth, CA. JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by ROBERT B.

2CASSADY; JEFFREY A. BERKOWITZ, Reston, VA; ROBERT ERIC BILIK, DANIEL M. MAHFOOD, McGuireWoods LLP, Jacksonville, FL; DEBORAH SEGERS, Fidelity National Information Systems, Inc., Jacksonville, FL.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 9, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alexsam, Inc. v. Wildcard Systems, Inc., No. 17-1682 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1682-20180109
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1682-20180109

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.