Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Philips Lighting Holding B.V. v. Wangs Alliance Corporation, No. 17-1529 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1529
Decided
March 7, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PHILIPS LIGHTING HOLDING B.V.,

Appellant

v.

WANGS ALLIANCE CORPORATION, DBA WAC

LIGHTING CO.,

Appellee

2017-1529

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-01291.

JUDGMENT

ARIANNA EVERS, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT MANHAS; MARK CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, CYNTHIA D. VREELAND, Boston, MA. TIGRAN VARDANIAN, Radulescu LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ETAI LAHAV, DAVID C. RADULESCU, MICHAEL D. SADOWITZ.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 7, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Philips Lighting Holding B.V. v. Wangs Alliance Corporation, No. 17-1529 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1529-20180307
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1529-20180307

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error