Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Cascades Projection LLC v. Epson America, Inc., No. 17-1517 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 13, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1517
Decided
March 13, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CASCADES PROJECTION LLC,

Appellant

v.

EPSON AMERICA, INC., SONY CORPORATION,

Appellees

2017-1517, 2017-1518

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-01206, IPR2015-01846.

JUDGMENT

PHILIP P. MANN, Mann Law Group, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT GREENSPOON, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, Chicago, IL.

DAVID J. BALL, JR., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee Epson America, Inc. Also represented by NICHOLAS P. GROOMBRIDGE, JENNY CHIA CHENG WU, New York, NY.

2ANDREW J. BRAMHALL, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellee Sony Corporation. Also represented by KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON; MATTHEW A. SMITH, Smith Baluch LLP, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cascades Projection LLC v. Epson America, Inc., No. 17-1517 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 13, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1517-20180313
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1517-20180313

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.