Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Grober v. Mako Products, Inc., No. 17-1507 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 6, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1507
Decided
December 6, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit DAVID GROBER, VOICE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

MAKO PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

AIR SEA LAND PRODUCTIONS, INC.,

CINEVIDEOTECH, INC., SPECTRUM EFFECTS,

INC., BLUE SKY AERIALS, INC., DOES 1-10,

Defendants

2017-1507

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:04-cv-08604-JZDTB, Judge Jack Zouhary.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT J. LAUSON, Lauson & Tarver, LLP, El Segundo, CA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Voice International, Inc. also represented by JON HOKANSON, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA.

2DAVID LIETZ, Varnell & Warwick, PA, Lady Lake, FL, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BRIAN W. WARWICK.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 6, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Grober v. Mako Products, Inc., No. 17-1507 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 6, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1507-20181206
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1507-20181206

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error