Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Security People, Inc. v. Ojmar US, LLC, No. 17-1385 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1385
Decided
November 13, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SECURITY PEOPLE, INC.,

Appellant

v.

OJMAR US, LLC,

Appellee

2017-1385

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-01130.

JUDGMENT

TAREK N. FAHMI, Ascenda Law Group, PC, San Jose, CA, argued for appellant. JAMES L. DAY, JR., Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by RODERICK MANLEY THOMPSON, DANIEL C. CALLAWAY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Security People, Inc. v. Ojmar US, LLC, No. 17-1385 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1385-20171113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1385-20171113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.