Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Knauf Insulation, Inc., No. 17-1317 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1317
Decided
March 9, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: KNAUF INSULATION, INC., KNAUF

INSULATION, SPRL,

Appellants

2017-1317, 2017-1323, 2017-1324

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 90/013,029, 90/013,030, 90/013,156.

JUDGMENT

JOSHUA PAUL LARSEN, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES SWEENEY. LORE A. UNT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 9, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Knauf Insulation, Inc., No. 17-1317 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1317-20180309
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1317-20180309

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.