Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Stambler v. Mastercard International Inc., No. 17-1272 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1272
Decided
November 13, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

LEON STAMBLER,

Appellant

v.

MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INC.,

Appellee

2017-1272

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2015-00044.

JUDGMENT

BRENT N. BUMGARDNER, Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort Worth, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by THOMAS CECIL; ROBERT GREENSPOON, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, Chicago, IL. ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS, Baker Botts, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT C. SCHEINFELD, CHRISTOPHER PATRICK, New York, NY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Stambler v. Mastercard International Inc., No. 17-1272 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-17-1272-20171113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1272-20171113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.