Fed. Cir.

CF Crespe LLC v. Silicon Laboratories Inc., No. 17-1072 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2017)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 17-1072
Decided: December 7, 2017
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CF CRESPE LLC,

Appellant

SILICON LABORATORIES INC.,

Appellee

2017-1072

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-00615.

JUDGMENT

CRAIG ROBERT SMITH, Lando & Anastasi, LLP, Cambridge, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ERIC P. CARNEVALE.

PETER J. AYERS, Law Office of Peter J. Ayers, Austin, TX, argued for appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, SCHALL, and REYNA, Circuit Judg-

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 7, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

CF Crespe LLC v. Silicon Laboratories Inc., No. 17-1072 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2017).

Record ID: CAFC-17-1072-20171207
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-1072-20171207

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error