Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. Arris Group, Inc., No. 16-2561 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2561
Decided
August 11, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

ARRIS GROUP, INC., COX COMMUNICATIONS,

INC.,

Appellees

2016-2561

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-00635, IPR2015-01796.

JUDGMENT

WALTER E. HANLEY, JR., Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ARMIN GHIAM, SHEILA MORTAZAVI.

ANDREW RYAN SOMMER, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Appellee ARRIS Group, Inc. also represented by ERIC M. GOLDSTEIN; JONATHAN E. RETSKY, Chicago, IL.

2MITCHELL G. STOCKWELL, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for appellee Cox Communications, Inc. Also represented by RICHARD W. GOLDSTUCKER, MICHAEL TURTON.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 11, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. Arris Group, Inc., No. 16-2561 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-2561-20170811
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-2561-20170811

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error