Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Viraj Profiles Limited v. ITC, No. 16-2482 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2482
Decided
September 11, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VIRAJ PROFILES LIMITED,

Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

VALBRUNA SLATER STAINLESS, INC.,

VALBRUNA STAINLESS INC., ACCIAIERIE

VALBRUNA S.P.A.,

Intervenors

2016-2482

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-933.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT A. JAFFE, Kutak Rock LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by LIZBETH ROBIN LEVINSON.

LUCY GRACE D. NOYOLA, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission,

2Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, DOMINIC L. BIANCHI.

STEFAN MENTZER, White & Case LLP, New York, NY, argued for intervenors. Also represented by DIMITRIOS T. DRIVAS; GREGORY J. SPAK, JAMES P. GAGEN, TING-TING KAO, SONIA W. MURPHY, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 11, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Viraj Profiles Limited v. ITC, No. 16-2482 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-2482-20170911
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-2482-20170911

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.