Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Instradent USA, Inc. v. ITC, No. 16-2336 (Fed. Cir. July 19, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2336
Decided
July 19, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INSTRADENT USA, INC., JJGC INDUSTRIA E

COMERCIO DE MATERIAIS DENTARIOS S/A,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

NOBEL BIOCARE SERVICES AG, NOBEL

BIOCARE USA, LLC,

Intervenors

2016-2336

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-934.

JUDGMENT

NICOLA ANTHONY PISANO, Foley & Lardner LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JOSE L. PATINO.

MEGAN MICHELE VALENTINE, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission,

2Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, DOMINIC L. BIANCHI.

SHEILA N. SWAROOP, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Irvine, CA, argued for intervenors. Also represented by JOHN B. SGANGA, JR., BARAA KAHF, SEAN MURRAY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY and

CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Instradent USA, Inc. v. ITC, No. 16-2336 (Fed. Cir. July 19, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-2336-20170719
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-2336-20170719

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error