Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Integrated Claims Systems, LLC v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas, No. 16-2163 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2163
Decided
April 11, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INTEGRATED CLAIMS SYSTEMS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

TRAVELERS LLOYDS OF TEXAS INSURANCE

COMPANY, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY

COMPANY,

Appellees

2016-2163, 2016-2164

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. CBM2014-00186, CBM2014-00187.

JUDGMENT

JOHN F. WARD, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID LINDENBAUM.

ROBERT L. BURNS, II, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellees. Also represented by JOSHUA GOLDBERG, Washington, DC; JUSTIN A. HENDRIX, Palo Alto, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 11, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Integrated Claims Systems, LLC v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas, No. 16-2163 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-2163-20170411
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-2163-20170411

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.