Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Intermetro Industries Corp v. Enovate Medical, LLC, No. 16-2153 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2153
Decided
May 9, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INTERMETRO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

ENOVATE MEDICAL, LLC,

Appellee

2016-2153, 2016-2162

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-00300, IPR2015-00301.

JUDGMENT

GLENN E. FORBIS, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC, Troy, MI, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID UTYKANSKI, GEORGE DIMITRIOS MOUSTAKAS, NEAL D. SANBORN.

NORMAN H. ZIVIN, Cooper & Dunham, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by RICHARD S. ORDER, ADAM BENJAMIN MARKS, Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, PC, Hartford, CT.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 9, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Intermetro Industries Corp v. Enovate Medical, LLC, No. 16-2153 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-2153-20170509
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-2153-20170509

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error