Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Delphix Corp. v. Matal, No. 16-2072 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2072
Decided
December 12, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

DELPHIX CORP.,

Appellant

v.

JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS

AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK

OFFICE,

Intervenor

2016-2072

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-00128.

JUDGMENT

J. DAVID HADDEN, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAINA S. SHAMILOV; TODD RICHARD GREGORIAN, PHILLIP JOHN HAACK, San Francisco, CA.

2PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, COKE MORGAN STEWART.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Delphix Corp. v. Matal, No. 16-2072 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-2072-20171212
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-2072-20171212

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.