Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Ericsson Inc., No. 16-1955 (Fed. Cir. June 19, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1955
Decided
June 19, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,

Appellant

v.

ERICSSON INC., TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM

ERICSSON,

Appellees

2016-1955

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-01185.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL E. JOFFRE, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL ASHLEY AINSWORTH, LORI A. GORDON, PAULINE PELLETIER, BYRON LEROY PICKARD.

J. ANDREW LOWES, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Richardson, TX, argued for appellees. Also represented by CLINT S. WILKINS; DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS, Dallas, TX.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and STOLL, Circuit Judg-

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Ericsson Inc., No. 16-1955 (Fed. Cir. June 19, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-1955-20170619
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-1955-20170619

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error