Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

XY, LLC v. ABS Global, Inc., No. 16-1897 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1897
Decided
May 23, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

XY, LLC,

Appellant

v.

ABS GLOBAL, INC., GENUS PLC,

Appellees

2016-1897

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-01161.

JUDGMENT

KIRT S. O'NEILL, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, San Antonio, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by REHAN M. SAFIULLAH, Houston, TX. STEVEN J. HOROWITZ, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellees. Also represented by CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 23, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

XY, LLC v. ABS Global, Inc., No. 16-1897 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-16-1897-20180523
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-1897-20180523

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.