Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Ferri, No. 16-1877 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1877
Decided
February 13, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: NICHOLAS WILLIAM FERRI, DAVID J.

EARLEY,

Appellants 2016-1877

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/160,823.

JUDGMENT

DANIEL P. HOMILLER, Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, PLLC, Cary, NC, argued for appellants.

JOSEPH GERARD PICCOLO, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SARAH E. CRAVEN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Ferri, No. 16-1877 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-1877-20170213
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-1877-20170213

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.