Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Greatbatch Ltd. v. AVX Corporation, No. 16-1875 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1875
Decided
February 9, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GREATBATCH LTD.,

Appellant

v.

AVX CORPORATION,

Appellee

2016-1875

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00697.

JUDGMENT

RICHARD ALAN NEIFELD, Neifeld IP Law, PC, Alexandria VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT MIHAIL.

MICHAEL ROBERT HOUSTON, Foley & Lardner LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by RICHARD SPENCER MONTEI.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Greatbatch Ltd. v. AVX Corporation, No. 16-1875 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-1875-20170209
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-1875-20170209

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.