Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

MH Systems, Inc. v. Coldharbour Marine Limited, No. 16-1768 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1768
Decided
March 8, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MH SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

COLDHARBOUR MARINE LIMITED,

Appellee

2016-1768

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,559.

JUDGMENT

BRADLEY D. ROUSH, Foley & Lardner LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by GEORGE ELLSWORTH QUILLIN, JESSICA FLORES; MATTHEW AMBROS, Boston, MA.

PETER DANIEL SIDDOWAY, Sage Patent Group, PLLC, Raleigh, NC, argued for appellee. Also represented by LYNNE A. BORCHERS.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, LINN, and STOLL, Circuit Judg-

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 8, 2017 /s/Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

MH Systems, Inc. v. Coldharbour Marine Limited, No. 16-1768 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-1768-20170308
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-1768-20170308

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error