Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Monkeymedia, Inc v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment, No. 16-1558 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1558
Decided
January 18, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MONKEYMEDIA, INC.,

Appellant

v.

BUENA VISTA HOME ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT INC.,

PARAMOUNT HOME ENTERTAINMENT INC.,

TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX HOME

ENTERTAINMENT LLC, UNIVERSAL STUDIOS

HOME ENTERTAINMENT LLC, WARNER BROS.

HOME ENTERTAINMENT INC.,

Appellees

2016-1558

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,256.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM CHRISTIAN, Graves Dougherty Hearon & Moody, PC, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MATTHEW CHRISTOPHER POWERS.

2BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by SETH W. LLOYD, JOSEPH R. PALMORE; DAVID LEE FEHRMAN, MEHRAN ARJOMAND, VINCENT JOSEPH BELUSKO, Los Angeles, CA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 18, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Monkeymedia, Inc v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment, No. 16-1558 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-1558-20170118
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-1558-20170118

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.