Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC, No. 16-1360 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1360
Decided
December 9, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC,

Appellant

v.

MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,

Appellee

2016-1360

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00500.

JUDGMENT

JOHN R. KING, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Irvine, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by BRENTON R. BABCOCK, EDWARD M. CANNON, PAUL A. STEWART.

ADAM CONRAD, King & Spalding LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DARYL JOSEFFER, PAUL ALESSIO MEZZINA, Washington, DC; JOHN C. ALEMANNI, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Winston-Salem, NC; STEVEN MOORE, San Francisco, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 9, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC, No. 16-1360 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-16-1360-20161209
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-1360-20161209

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.