Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Zond LLC v. Gillette Company, No. 16-1327 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1327
Decided
January 18, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ZOND LLC,

Appellant

v.

THE GILLETTE COMPANY, ADVANCED MICRO

DEVICES, INC., RENESAS ELECTRONICS

CORPORATION, RENESAS ELECTRONICS

AMERICA, INC.,

Appellees

2016-1327, 2016-1328, 2016-1419, 2016-1420

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2014-00477, IPR2014-00479, IPR2014-00799, IPR2014-00803, IPR2014-00855, IPR2014-00858, IPR2014-00995, IPR2014-00996, IPR2014-01042, IPR2014-01061.

JUDGMENT

TAREK N. FAHMI, Ascenda Law Group, PC, San Jose, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by HOLLY J. ATKINSON.

2MARK G. MATUSCHAK, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for all appellees. Appellee The Gillette Company also represented by MARK CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, ERIC FLETCHER; DAVID LANGDON CAVANAUGH, Washington, DC.

RYAN KEN YAGURA, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for appellee Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Also represented by XIN-YI ZHOU; BRADLEY GARCIA, Washington, DC.

JOHN JOSEPH FELDHAUS, Foley & Lardner LLP, Washington, DC, for appellees Renesas Electronics Corporation, Renesas Electronics America, Inc. Also represented by PAVAN KUMAR AGARWAL, GEORGE ELLSWORTH QUILLIN; MICHAEL ROBERT HOUSTON, Chicago, IL.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 18, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Zond LLC v. Gillette Company, No. 16-1327 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-1327-20170118
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-1327-20170118

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.