Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

BIG Baboon, Inc. v. LEE, No. 16-1232 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 5, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1232
Decided
August 5, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BIG BABOON, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MICHELLE K. LEE, DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, UNITED STATES PATENT

AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Defendants-Appellees

2016-1232

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:14-cv-01771-JLR, Judge James L. Robart.

JUDGMENT

LANCE DONALD REICH, Han Santos Reich PLLC, Seattle, WA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

MEGAN BARBERO, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ANNETTE L. HAYES, MARK R. FREEMAN; KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Office

2of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 5, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

BIG Baboon, Inc. v. LEE, No. 16-1232 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 5, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-16-1232-20160805
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-1232-20160805

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.