Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Datatreasury Corporation v. Jack Henry and Associates, Inc, No. 16-1050 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2016)

Dismissed
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1050
Decided
October 13, 2016
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit DATATREASURY CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

JACK HENRY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Appellee

2016-1050, 2016-1052

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. CBM2014-00056, CBM2014-00057.

Decided: October 13, 2016

EDWARD K. CHIN, Albritton Law Firm, Longview, TX. argued for appellant. Also represented by DEREK TOD GILLILAND, Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, Daingerfield, TX; CHRISTIAN JOHN HURT, Dallas, TX.

RUSSELL S. JONES, JR., Polsinelli PC, Kansas City, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAY E. HEIDRICK.

22 DATATREASURY CORP. v. JACK HENRY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Before MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We deny the appeal as moot in light of our order in DataTreasury Corp. v. Fidelity National Information, No. 16-1046.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Datatreasury Corporation v. Jack Henry and Associates, Inc, No. 16-1050 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-16-1050-20161013
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-1050-20161013

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error