Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc., No. 15-2069 (Fed. Cir. July 11, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-2069
Decided
July 11, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ARENDI S.A.R.L.,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC., MOTOROLA

MOBILITY LLC,

Cross-Appellants

2015-2069, 2015-2070, 2015-2071

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2014-00206, IPR2014-00207.

JUDGMENT

BRUCE D. SUNSTEIN, Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT M. ASHER.

JOSEPH R. PALMORE, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for cross-appellants. Cross-Appellant Apple Inc. also represented by SETH W. LLOYD, BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI; DAVID LEE FEHRMAN, MEHRAN ARJOMAND, Los Angeles, CA.

2ROBERT J. KENT, Turner Boyd LLP, Redwood City, CA, for cross-appellants Google Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC. Also represented by MATTHEW A. SMITH.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, LINN, and O’MALLEY, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc., No. 15-2069 (Fed. Cir. July 11, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-2069-20160711
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-2069-20160711

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error