Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Ericsson Inc., No. 15-1947 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1947
Decided
August 16, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC,

Appellant

v.

ERICSSON INC.,

Appellee

2015-1947

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00527.

JUDGMENT

BYRON LEROY PICKARD, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by LORI A. GORDON.

ROBERT CARTER MATTSON, Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by WILBUR T. BAKER, ALEXANDER BEACH ENGLEHART.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 16, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Ericsson Inc., No. 15-1947 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1947-20160816
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1947-20160816

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error