Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Bosch Automotive Service v. Iancu, No. 15-1928 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2018)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1928
Decided
March 15, 2018
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE SOLUTIONS,

LLC,

Appellant

v.

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2015-1928

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00183.

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Before NEWMAN, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

22 BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE v. IANCU

O R D E R

The United States Patent and Trademark Office petitions for panel rehearing of this court’s December 22, 2017 opinion, seeking to “clarify a sentence in its precedential opinion that could give rise to needless misunderstandings in the future.” Specifically, the USPTO raised the concern that the court’s opinion could be read, incorrectly, to have interpreted 35 U.S.C. 316(e). Bosch Automotive Service Solutions, LLC responded, in a way that supported the USPTO’s view that the opinion could be improperly misread. To avoid that unnecessary possibility, we grant the petition for the limited purpose of amending our earlier opinion.

The sentence beginning at page 22, line 29 is amended to read: “Rather, the petitioner bears the burden of proving that the proposed amended claims are unpatentable by a preponderance of the evidence.”

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition is granted to the limited extent noted above. FOR THE COURT

March 15, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bosch Automotive Service v. Iancu, No. 15-1928 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1928-20180315
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1928-20180315

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.