Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Everymd LLC v. Facebook, Inc., No. 15-1924 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 28, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1924
Decided
March 28, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

EVERYMD LLC,

Appellant

v.

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Appellee

2015-1924

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2014-00242.

JUDGMENT

FRANK MICHAEL WEYER, TECHCOASTLAW, Los Angeles, CA, for appellant.

HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for appellee. Also represented by REUBEN HO-YEN CHEN, MARK R. WEINSTEIN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 28, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Everymd LLC v. Facebook, Inc., No. 15-1924 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 28, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1924-20160328
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1924-20160328

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error