Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc., No. 15-1867 (Fed. Cir. May 10, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1867
Decided
May 10, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MOTION GAMES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.,

Appellee

2015-1867

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00164.

JUDGMENT

DAVID MICHAEL UNDERHILL, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by PATRICK M. LAFFERTY; JOSHUA M. KALB, Hunton & Williams LLP, Atlanta, GA.

RUDOLF EDWARD HUTZ, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN D. ROCHE, Chicago, IL; BARRY JOHN COYNE, Pittsburgh, PA; JOSEPH PRESTA, Nixon & Vanderhye P.C., Arlington, VA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 10, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc., No. 15-1867 (Fed. Cir. May 10, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1867-20160510
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1867-20160510

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error