Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Portage Electric Products, Inc, No. 15-1860 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1860
Decided
April 12, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: PORTAGE ELECTRIC PRODUCTS, INC.,

Appellant 2015-1860

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 95/000,070.

JUDGMENT

PETER CHARLES SCHECHTER, Osha Liang LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant.

SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 12, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Portage Electric Products, Inc, No. 15-1860 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1860-20160412
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1860-20160412

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.