Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Clouding Corp. v. Unified Patents, Inc., No. 15-1799 (Fed. Cir. May 19, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1799
Decided
May 19, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CLOUDING CORP.,

Appellant

v.

UNIFIED PATENTS, INC.,

Appellee

2015-1799

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00586, IPR2014-00306.

JUDGMENT

TAREK N. FAHMI, Ascenda Law Group, PC, San Jose, CA, argued for appellant.

DANIEL CRAIG COOLEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented JAMES R. BARNEY, Washington, DC; JONATHAN STROUD, Washington, DC.

ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA,

2argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MICHAEL SUMNER FORMAN, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 19, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Clouding Corp. v. Unified Patents, Inc., No. 15-1799 (Fed. Cir. May 19, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1799-20160519
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1799-20160519

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error