Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Core Laboratories LP v. Spectrum Tracer Services, No. 15-1789 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1789
Decided
April 7, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CORE LABORATORIES LP,

Appellant

v.

SPECTRUM TRACER SERVICES, L.L.C.,

Appellee

2015-1789, 2015-1790

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in Nos. 95/002,141, 95/002,144.

JUDGMENT

STEFFEN NATHANAEL JOHNSON, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER ERNEST MILLS, EIMERIC REIG-PLESSIS; JOSEPH DEAN LECHTENBERGER, Houston, TX; TANYA L. CHANEY, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Houston, TX.

DENNIS DON BROWN, Brown Patent Law, P.L.L.C., Broken Arrow, OK, argued for appellee. Also represented

2by JOHN CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, Johnson & Jones, P.C., Tulsa, OK. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 7, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Core Laboratories LP v. Spectrum Tracer Services, No. 15-1789 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1789-20160407
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1789-20160407

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.