Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Moderustic, Inc. v. American Fireglass, Inc., No. 15-1772 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1772
Decided
March 11, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MODERUSTIC, INC.,

Appellant

v.

AMERICAN FIREGLASS, INC.,

Appellee

2015-1772

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,724.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH PIA, Pia Anderson Dorius Reynard & Moss, Salt Lake City, UT, for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT AYCOCK.

PHILLIP SAMOURIS, Higgs, Fletcher & Mack LLP, San Diego, CA, for appellee. Also represented by CHARLES F. REIDELBACH, JR.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 11, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Moderustic, Inc. v. American Fireglass, Inc., No. 15-1772 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1772-20160311
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1772-20160311

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.