Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Phison Electronics Corp. v. Silicon Motion Technology, No. 15-1632 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1632
Decided
February 11, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP.,

Appellant

v.

SILICON MOTION TECHNOLOGY CORP.,

Appellee

2015-1632

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00473.

JUDGMENT

DAVID MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID M. BARKAN, Redwood City, CA; PROSHANTO MUKHERJI, Boston, MA.

JASON ALEXANDER ENGEL, K&L Gates LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN EDWARD WEED, DEVON C. BEANE; MELVIN CHAN, AKA Chan LLP, Santa Clara, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 11, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Phison Electronics Corp. v. Silicon Motion Technology, No. 15-1632 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1632-20160211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1632-20160211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error