Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Netac Technology Co., Ltd. v. Sandisk Corporation, No. 15-1630 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1630
Decided
February 9, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit NETAC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,

Appellant

v.

SANDISK CORPORATION,

Appellee

2015-1630

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 95/000,384.

JUDGMENT

WENYE TAN, Anova Law Group, PLLC, Sterling, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by XIAOQUN WU.

DARRYL J. ADAMS, Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN W. OAKS; RUSSELL J. CRAIN, Dallas, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and REYNA,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Netac Technology Co., Ltd. v. Sandisk Corporation, No. 15-1630 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1630-20160209
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1630-20160209

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error