Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Grandeye Limited v. Google Inc., No. 15-1622 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 28, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1622
Decided
March 28, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GRANDEYE LIMITED,

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE INC.,

Appellee

2015-1622, 2015-1624, 2015-1625

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00546, IPR2013-00547, IPR2013-00548.

JUDGMENT

STEPHEN YEE CHOW, Burns & Levinson, LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant.

PRATIK A. SHAH, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by EMILY CURTIS JOHNSON, DAVID VONDLE, ZE-WEN JULIUS CHEN, CONO A. CARRANO, ASHRAF FAWZY.

JEREMIAH HELM, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for

2intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, STACY BETH MARGOLIES.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 28, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Grandeye Limited v. Google Inc., No. 15-1622 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 28, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1622-20160328
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1622-20160328

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error