Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Gold Medal Products Co. v. C. Cretors and Company, No. 15-1449 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 12, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1449
Decided
November 12, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GOLD MEDAL PRODUCTS CO.,

Appellant

v.

C. CRETORS AND COMPANY,

Appellee

2015-1449

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/000,665.

JUDGMENT

BRETT A. SCHATZ, Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP, Cincinnati, OH, argued for appellant. STEPHEN E. ARNETT, Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for appellee. Also represented by KEVIN ANDREW ZECK, CORBYN J. THORSEN; MICHAEL O. WARNECKE, Chicago, IL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 12, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Gold Medal Products Co. v. C. Cretors and Company, No. 15-1449 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 12, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1449-20151112
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1449-20151112

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error