Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Trueposition Inc. v. Polaris Wireless, Inc., No. 15-1330 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 15, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1330
Decided
December 15, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TRUEPOSITION INC.,

Appellant

v.

POLARIS WIRELESS, INC.,

Appellee

2015-1330

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2013-00323.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL J. BONELLA, Condo Roccia Koptiw LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL JORDAN.

JASON PAUL DEMONT, Kaplan, Breyer, Schwarz & Ottesen, LLP, Matawan, NJ, argued for appellee. Also represented by KENNETH OTTESEN; VINCENT MCGEARY, MICHAEL CUKOR, McGeary Cukor LLC, Morristown, NJ; BRAD PEDERSEN, Patterson Thuente Pedersen, P.A., Minneapolis, MN.

2JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, JEREMIAH HELM.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Trueposition Inc. v. Polaris Wireless, Inc., No. 15-1330 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 15, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1330-20151215
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1330-20151215

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.