Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Edward Tobinick, No. 15-1307 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 16, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1307
Decided
December 16, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE: EDWARD TOBINICK,

Appellant 2015-1307

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 105,866.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT W. HAHL, Neifeld IP Law, PC, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT MIHAIL.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

2ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 16, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Edward Tobinick, No. 15-1307 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 16, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1307-20151216
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1307-20151216

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error