Fed. Cir.

Wireless INK Corporation v. Facebook, Inc., No. 15-1299 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2015)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 15-1299
Decided: October 9, 2015
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit WIRELESS INK CORPORATION,

Appellant

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Appellee

2015-1299

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 95/001,989.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH BERNARD RYAN, Ryan, Mason & Lewis, LLP, Melville, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by PATRICK GREGORY MURRAY.

HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH L. STAMESHKIN, MARK R. WEINSTEIN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judg-

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Wireless INK Corporation v. Facebook, Inc., No. 15-1299 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2015).

Record ID: CAFC-15-1299-20151009
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1299-20151009

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error