Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Waters Technologies v. Agilent Technologies, No. 15-1281 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1281
Decided
December 11, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit WATERS TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., (AS

SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO AURORA SFC

SYSTEMS, INC.),

Appellee

2015-1281

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,910.

JUDGMENT

DEBORAH M. VERNON, McCarter & English, LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by KIA LYNN FREEMAN, ERIK PAUL BELT.

JOHN M. GRIEM, JR., Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 11, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Waters Technologies v. Agilent Technologies, No. 15-1281 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1281-20151211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1281-20151211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error