Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Corning Incorporated v. DSM IP Assets B.V., No. 15-1152 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1152
Decided
September 16, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CORNING INCORPORATED,

Appellant

v.

DSM IP ASSETS B.V.,

Appellee

2015-1152

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2013-00043.

CORNING INCORPORATED,

Appellant

v.

DSM IP ASSETS B.V.,

Appellee

2015-1162

2Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2013-00044.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL L. GOLDMAN, LeClairRyan, A Professional Corporation, Rochester, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by RICHARD A. MCGUIRK.

SHARON A. ISRAEL, Mayer Brown, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by KYLE E. FRIESEN; JOSEPH A. MAHONEY, ERICK J. PALMER, Chicago, IL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 16, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Corning Incorporated v. DSM IP Assets B.V., No. 15-1152 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1152-20150916
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1152-20150916

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error