Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Southwire Company, LLC v. Cerro Wire LLC, No. 15-1117 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 20, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1117
Decided
October 20, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, LLC,

Appellant

v.

CERRO WIRE LLC,

Cross-Appellant

2015-1117, 2015-1118

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/000,594.

JUDGMENT

KIRK T. BRADLEY, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER L. MCARDLE, New York, NY; KEITH E. BROYLES, Atlanta, GA.

PAUL RICHARD STEADMAN, DLA Piper US LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by MATTHEW D. SATCHWELL.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 20, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Southwire Company, LLC v. Cerro Wire LLC, No. 15-1117 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 20, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1117-20151020
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1117-20151020

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error