Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Schott Gemtron Corporation v. SSW Holding Company, Inc., No. 15-1073 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1073
Decided
August 11, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SCHOTT GEMTRON CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

SSW HOLDING COMPANY, INC.,

Appellee

2015-1073

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00358.

JUDGMENT

MARSHALL JOHN SCHMITT, Michael Best & Friedrich, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by GILBERTO EDUARDO ESPINOZA; ANDREW DUFRESNE, Madison, WI.

NATHANIEL L. DILGER, One LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by KAINOA ASUEGA; WILLIAM J. O’BRIEN, Beverly Hills, CA.

2WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 11, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Schott Gemtron Corporation v. SSW Holding Company, Inc., No. 15-1073 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1073-20150811
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1073-20150811

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error