Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Technologies, Inc., No. 15-1017 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1017
Decided
June 9, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PROLITEC, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Appellee

2015-1017

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00180.

JUDGMENT

ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. DEREK MCCORQUINDALE; CORY C. BELL, Boston, MA.

JOSHUA B. POND, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES, Winston-Salem, NC; DAVID CLAY HOLLOWAY, TIFFANY L. WILLIAMS, Atlanta, GA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Technologies, Inc., No. 15-1017 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1017-20150609
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1017-20150609

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error