Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., No. 15-1016 (Fed. Cir. May 26, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1016
Decided
May 26, 2016
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PROFECTUS TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., HUAWEI

TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., HUAWEI DEVICE

USA, INC., FUTUREWEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendants

DELL INC., APPLE INC., SAMSUNG

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC,

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT

COMPANY, L.P.,

Defendants-Appellees

2015-1016, 2015-1018, 2015-1019

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:11-cv-00474-MHS, 6:11-cv-00674-MHS, 6:11-cv-00676-MHS, Judge Michael H. Schneider.

ORDER

22 PROFECTUS TECH. LLC v. HUAWEI TECHS. CO., LTD.

Before MOORE, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

On October 27, 2015, we ordered the parties to prepare to show cause at oral argument as to why sanctions should not be imposed for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d). The parties addressed the issue of sanctions at oral argument and refiled corrected briefing and appendices following oral argument. Regarding the show-cause order on October 27, 2015, we decline to impose sanctions for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d). IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Sanctions are not imposed.

FOR THE COURT

May 26, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., No. 15-1016 (Fed. Cir. May 26, 2016).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1016-20160526
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1016-20160526

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.