Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

General Electric Company v. Vibrant Media, Inc., No. 15-1015 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1015
Decided
December 17, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

VIBRANT MEDIA, INC.,

Appellee

2015-1015

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00170.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

VIBRANT MEDIA, INC.,

Appellee

2015-1136

2Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00172.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL CASEY, Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN SCOTT DAVIDSON, Arlington, VA. MATTHEW B. LOWRIE, Foley & Lardner LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by KEVIN M. LITTMAN, CHRISTOPHER J. MCKENNA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

General Electric Company v. Vibrant Media, Inc., No. 15-1015 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1015-20151217
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1015-20151217

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.