Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Rexnord Industries, LLC v. Habasit Belting Incorporated, No. 14-1858 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1858
Decided
June 5, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit REXNORD INDUSTRIES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

HABASIT BELTING INCORPORATED,

Cross-Appellant

2014-1858, 2014-1859

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/000,071.

JUDGMENT

DAVID R. CROSS, Quarles & Brady, LLP, Milwaukee, WI, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHANNA WILBERT, JOEL AUSTIN.

MATTHEW THOMAS BAILEY, McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by RANDALL PYLES. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, PLAGER, and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 5, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Rexnord Industries, LLC v. Habasit Belting Incorporated, No. 14-1858 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1858-20150605
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1858-20150605

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error